![]() ![]() ![]() It means your save will no longer be accessible from the normal game, but you're at the end, so it's not a big deal. It basically involves downloading Dungeon Siege Toolkit, running DSMod or DSLOAMod, loading a save game near the final platform, which has not used the mod and then loading in your party from your normal save to trigger the cutscene and complete the fight. The workaround involves following the directions found in the "Dungeon Siege 1 Troubleshooting Guide" here This is caused by the SeeFar2020 mod screwing around with camera angles. Just chiming in, if you're still stuck, or for future people with the same problem. What is happening is the platform with the braziers is not dropping down to Gom's area. I just watched a youtube video of the ending. I can not get to the final boss encounter. If I hit ESC the screen goes black and I can not even ALT TAB back to windows. The MAIS is fully displayed in 89% of the cases.MikeSol: Ok, my character passes through the right hand side of the screen after the five braziers light up. The total evaluation of all crash tests shows that the dummy showed on average 69% of all injuries compared to the real accidents. With the AIS evaluation, the resulting injuries on the dummy could be compared with the real data. This provides an approximately realistic and easy-to-understand assessment of possible injuries. The simplified injury scale AIS3 was used. These component- and component group-related technical injuries are assigned to the correlating minimum injury severity and the correlating maximum injury severity. The analyzed damages of the technical autopsy are divided into four classes: "normal findings", "slightly damaged", "severely damaged", and "see findings". Damage diagnoses of the dummy were made according to a technical autopsy and recorded by means of photo documentation. The focus was more on the damage to the dummy. The measurement analysis was of secondary importance. Special attention was paid to the comparability to the dummy regarding age, weight and size. The real data from the GIDAS study serve as a model for this. Load cases from a collision speed of 35 km/h were carried out on the crash facility of CTS. Table 1 shows the data of the references and the results of the Biofidel-Dummy compared to them. The deviation of the sled velocity of all tests in relation to the human volunteer tests and cadaver tests is on average 1 %. Trajectory tracking was recorded with a high-speed camera and analyzed using Gom-Correlate software. All measuring devices are traceable to national standards. The calibration certificate documents and guarantees the traceability to national standards, which produce the physical units of measurements (SI). In the data recorder, the measured values are stored locally and close to the sensor by the digital sensor module, recorded and stored centrally. In the thorax area of the spine and in the pelvis area, acceleration measuring systems are arranged, which can measure the acceleration in 3 coordinate directions. The assembled system includes a crash-proof and inertial measuring unit which is arranged in the head with 3 rotation rate sensors and 3 acceleration sensors. A Kistler measuring system is used which is applied in the automotive industry in the standardized children's Q-Dummies. study with a collision speed up to 15km/h was used. For side impact tests, the documentation of 3 cadaver tests of the Shaw et. study up to a load case of 21km/h were used. As a reference for frontal impact tests, 5 volunteer tests of the Smith et. was used up to a collision speed of 8km/h. Furthermore, documented cadaver and volunteer tests are essential for the kinematic response of the dummy.Īs a reference for rear impact scenarios, 23 volunteer tests of the study of Ono. The focus is mainly on fractures, ruptures of the ligamenta and soft tissue injuries with a high influence on lethality. The used data from real accidents (GIDAS1) have the required informative value and depth of information, which are significant for the verification of human injuries. For use in accident research and vehicle safety as a pedestrian or occupant surrogate, the dummy has been and continues to be matched using documented volunteer and cadaver tests as well as real injury data from accident research. The verification is carried out on an application-specific basis. In order to be able to expand the performance spectrum, outstanding requirements are constantly being extended. These requirements are divided into fixed requirements and minimum requirements. This corresponds to a check whether the dummy model can sufficiently accurately reproduce the injury occurrence and biomechanics of an average man (50th percentile) in an accident. Validation has been a continuous process since the beginning of the research and development of the Biofidel-Dummy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |